<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cancer Treatment Today &#187; Pediatric Cancers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/category/professional-articles/pediatric-cancers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org</link>
	<description>Knowledge is Power</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 23:39:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Rituxan for Opsoclonus Myoclonus Syndrome &#8211; pro</title>
		<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/rituxan-for-opsoclonus-myoclonus-syndrome/</link>
		<comments>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/rituxan-for-opsoclonus-myoclonus-syndrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Levin, MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neurology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pediatric Cancers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/?p=9481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rituxan has been reported to alleviate the myoclonus opsoclonus syndrome in case reports and series. Presumably there is an immunologic mechanism underlying this observation. Approximately 50 % of patients with OMS have an associated neuroblastoma or associated infections have also been reported.  There is no specific diagnostic biomarker for OMS. Other treatments include as ACTH, corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rituxan has been reported to alleviate the myoclonus opsoclonus syndrome in case reports and series. Presumably there is an immunologic mechanism underlying this observation. Approximately 50 % of patients with OMS have an associated neuroblastoma or associated infections have also been reported.  There is no specific diagnostic biomarker for OMS. Other treatments include as ACTH, corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide and/or intravenous immunoglobulin, develop long-term neurological morbidity.  Gordon in a 2011 review concldued that future collaborative studies are needed to determine if early, aggressive therapy will improve the typically poor long-term neurological outcome.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Pranzatelli et al (2010) reported the findings of 12 immunotherapy-naïve children with opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome (OMS) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) B cell expansion who received rituximab, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and Iintravenous immunoglobulin.  Motor severity lessened 73 % by 6 months and 81 % at 1 year (p &lt; 0.0001).  Opsoclonus and action myoclonus disappeared rapidly, whereas gait ataxia and some other motor components improved more slowly.  Dosage of ACTH was tapered by 87 %.  Reduction in total CSF B cells was profound at 6 months (-93 %).  By study end, peripheral B cells returned to 53 % of baseline and serum IgM levels to 63 %.  Overall clinical response trailed peripheral B cell and IgM depletion, but improvement continued after their levels recovered.  All but 1 non-ambulatory subject became ambulatory without additional chemotherapy; 2 relapsed and remitted; 4 had rituximab-related or possibly related adverse events; and 2 had low-titer human anti-chimeric antibody.  The authors concluded that combination of rituximab with conventional agents as initial therapy was effective and safe.  They stated that a controlled trial with long-term safety monitoring is indicated.</p>
<p>The proposed treatment is in clinical trials, for example, Use of Rituximab in Opsoclonus-Myoclonus in Children With Neuroblastoma, NCT00202930.</p>
<p> <em>J. K. Sahu et al, </em>The opsoclonus–myoclonus syndrome, <em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Pract Neurol 2011;11:160-166 </span></em></p>
<div> Gorman MP. Update on diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis in opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010;22(6):745-750.</div>
<p> Pranzatelli MR, Tate ED, Swan JA, et al. B cell depletion therapy for new-onset opsoclonus-myoclonus. Mov Disord. 2010;25(2):238-242.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For Lay version see Here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/rituxan-for-opsoclonus-myoclonus-syndrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pediatric testicular cancer &#8211; pro</title>
		<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/pediatric-testicular-cancer-pro/</link>
		<comments>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/pediatric-testicular-cancer-pro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Levin, MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gastrointestinal Malignancies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pediatric Cancers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testicular Cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/?p=7862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Malignant germ cell tumors (MGCT) account for 3% to 4% of childhood malignancies (&#60; 15 years of age). Before the advent of multimodal therapy, children with MGCT could expect poor outcomes. Subsequent therapy was based on the larger adult experience with epithelial ovarian cancer because there was a paucity of clinical trials in pediatric patients. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Malignant germ cell tumors (MGCT) account for 3% to 4% of childhood malignancies (&lt; 15 years of age). Before the advent of multimodal therapy, children with MGCT could expect poor outcomes. Subsequent therapy was based on the larger adult experience with epithelial ovarian cancer because there was a paucity of clinical trials in pediatric patients. Cyclophosphamide-based therapy improved the outcome for patients with localized MGC but for patients with advanced disease, outcome remained poor. The Einhorn regimen dramatically improved the outcome of adults with testicular MGCT and quickly became the standard of care. Concerns about the potential toxicity of cisplatin and bleomycin limited use of this combination in pediatric patients. Most pediatric studies incorporated these agents in combination with cyclophosphamide-based therapy. An excellent 2-year disease-free survival rate was reported for 13 children treated with cisplatin-based therapy.</p>
<p>Boys and adolescents with stages III and IV testicular tumors are treated with surgical resection followed by four courses of standard or high-dose PEB (platinum, etoposide, bleomycin) therapy. The 6-year survival outcome for stage III and IV males younger than 15 years was 100%, with 6-year EFS of 100% and 94%, respectively. The use of high-dose PEB therapy did not improve the outcome for these boys but did cause increased incidence of ototoxicity. Excellent outcomes for boys with testicular germ cell tumors using surgery and observation for stage I tumors and carboplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (JEB) and other cisplatin-containing chemotherapy regimens for stage II–IV tumors have also been reported by European investigators. Thus, surgery followed by standard-dose platinum-based chemotherapy is the recommended approach for stages II–IV testicular germ cell tumors in children younger than 15 years.</p>
<p>N. Marina, W. B. London, A. L. Frazier, S. Lauer, F. Rescorla, B. Cushing, M. H. Malogolowkin, R. P. Castleberry, R. B. Womer, and T. Olson<br />
Prognostic Factors in Children With Extragonadal Malignant Germ Cell Tumors: A Pediatric Intergroup Study<br />
J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2006; 24(16): 2544 &#8211; 2548</p>
<p>Paul C. Rogers, Thomas A. Olson, John W. Cullen, Deborah F. Billmire, Neyssa Marina, Frederick Rescorla, Mary M. Davis, Wendy B. London, Stephen J. Lauer, Roger H. Giller, Barbara Cushing, Treatment of Children and Adolescents With Stage II Testicular and Stages I and II Ovarian Malignant Germ Cell Tumors: A Pediatric Intergroup Study—Pediatric Oncology Group 9048 and Children&#8217;s Cancer Group 8891 Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 17 (September 1), 2004: pp. 3563-3569</p>
<p>PDQ &#8211; <a href="http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/extracranial-germ-cell/HealthProfessional/page8">http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/extracranial-germ-cell/HealthProfessional/page8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/pediatric-testicular-cancer-pro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Topotecan and cytoxan for neuroblastoma &#8211; pro</title>
		<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/topotecan-and-cytoxan-for-neuroblastoma-pro/</link>
		<comments>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/topotecan-and-cytoxan-for-neuroblastoma-pro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 01:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pediatric Cancers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/?p=6962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Topotecan and cyclophosphamide are both active drugs in neuroblastoma and various combinations of these two drugs with or without other additional drugs have been used in a number of phase II trials. There are no FDA approved drugs for neuroblastoma and therefore this regimen and the individual drugs are considered off-label and experimental but it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<p>Topotecan and cyclophosphamide are both active drugs in neuroblastoma and various combinations of these two drugs with or without other additional drugs have been used in a number of phase II trials. There are no FDA approved drugs for neuroblastoma and therefore this regimen and the individual drugs are considered off-label and experimental but it is medically necessary  based on phase II studies, one phase III study  and the lack of alternatives. Phase III studies are difficult to perform in this disease because of the wide use of bone marrow transplatation. Topotecan and Cytoxan are not NCCN Compendia and NCCN guidelines recognized and I was unable to check Uptodate since I do not ahve a subscription to this proprietary database. A recent comparative phase III study found that &#8220;There is a trend toward better results with T+C than T. Incorporation of the combination into front line treatment plans deserves further exploration. &#8221;<br />
Saylors, Robert L., III, Stine, Kimo C., Sullivan, Jim, Kepner, James L., Wall, Donna A., Bernstein, Mark L., Harris, Michael B., Hayashi, Robert, Vietti, Teresa J.<br />
Cyclophosphamide Plus Topotecan in Children With Recurrent or Refractory Solid Tumors: A Pediatric Oncology Group Phase II Study<br />
J Clin Oncol 2001 19: 3463-3469</p>
<p>Thorsten Simon et al, Topotecan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (TCE) in the treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma. Results of a phase-II trial Journal Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Volume 133, Number 9 / September, 2007</p>
<p>Frantz, C. N., London, W. B., Diller, L., Seeger, R., Sawyer, K.<br />
Recurrent neuroblastoma: Randomized treatment with topotecan + cyclophosphamide (T+C) vs. topotecan alone(T). A POG/CCG Intergroup Study<br />
J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts) 2004 22: 8512</p>
<p>Neuroblastoma 2005<br />
Publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg<br />
ISBN 978-3-540-40841-3 (Print) 978-3-540-26616-7 (Online) , p. 199</p>
</div>
</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/topotecan-and-cytoxan-for-neuroblastoma-pro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3f8 and leukine for neuroblastoma &#8211; pro</title>
		<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/3f8-and-leukine-for-neuroblastoma-pro/</link>
		<comments>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/3f8-and-leukine-for-neuroblastoma-pro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pediatric Cancers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/?p=6959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The proposed therapy is a clinical phase II trial performed at MSKCC. Monoclonal antibodies can locate tumor cells and either kill them or deliver tumor-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. Combining colony-stimulating factors, such as sargramostim, with monoclonal antibodies may be an effective treatment for advanced neuroblastoma. It is a Phase II trial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proposed therapy is a clinical phase II trial performed at MSKCC. Monoclonal antibodies can locate tumor cells and either kill them or deliver tumor-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. Combining colony-stimulating factors, such as sargramostim, with monoclonal antibodies may be an effective treatment for advanced neuroblastoma. It is a Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of monoclonal antibody 3F8 plus sargramostim in treating patients who have advanced neuroblastoma.</p>
<p>Dr. Kushner&#8217;s team ahs completed a study of this regimen with a monoclonal antobody and has a manuscript that is ready for submission. There are no publications yet available to assess this therapy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/3f8-and-leukine-for-neuroblastoma-pro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ch14.18 for neuroblastoma &#8211; pro</title>
		<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/ch14-18-for-neuroblastoma-pro/</link>
		<comments>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/ch14-18-for-neuroblastoma-pro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 01:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pediatric Cancers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/?p=6956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ch14.18 is a chimeric human/murine anti-GD2 antibody, lyses neuroblastoma cells. This study determined the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and toxicity of ch14.18 given in combination with interleukin-2 (IL-2) after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC)/stem-cell rescue (SCR). Biologic correlates including ch14.18 levels, soluble IL-2 receptor levels, and human antichimeric antibody (HACA) activity were evaluated. A Phase I study [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<p>Ch14.18 is a chimeric human/murine anti-GD2 antibody, lyses neuroblastoma cells. This study determined the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and toxicity of ch14.18 given in combination with interleukin-2 (IL-2) after high-dose chemotherapy (HDC)/stem-cell rescue (SCR). Biologic correlates including ch14.18 levels, soluble IL-2 receptor levels, and human antichimeric antibody (HACA) activity were evaluated. A Phase I study enrolled 25 patients. The MTD of ch14.18 was determined to be 25 mg/m2/d for 4 days given concurrently with 4.5 x 106 U/m2/d of IL-2 for 4 days. IL-2 was also given at a dose of 3 x 106 U/m2/d for 4 days starting 1 week before ch14.18. Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity due to ch14.18 and IL-2. Common toxicities included pain, fever, nausea, emesis, diarrhea, urticaria, mild elevation of hepatic transaminases, capillary leak syndrome, and hypotension. No death attributable to toxicity of therapy occurred. No additional toxicity was seen when cis-retinoic acid (cis-RA) was given between courses of ch14.18. No patient treated at the MTD developed HACA. Conclusion ch14.18 in combination with IL-2 was tolerable in the early post-HDC/SCR period. cis-RA can be administered safely between courses of ch14.18 and cytokines.<br />
This was followed by a phase III trial. A recent randomized phase 3 clinical trial (ANBL0032, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00026312) in children with high-risk neuroblastoma following autologous stem cell transplant conducted by the Children&#8217;s Oncology Group (COG) found that the primary study endpoint [event-free survival (EFS) from randomization] to be significantly prolonged for patients on the ch14.18-based experimental immunotherapy regimen (a combination of isotretinoin plus immunotherapy with ch14.18, IL-2, and GM-CSF) compared to the standard maintenance therapy post-transplantation (isotretinoin).   This conclusion is based on results of a planned study interim analysis performed by the COG Data Safety and Monitoring Committee (DSMC). As a result of the ANBL0032 study findings, COG and DCTD now consider the ch14.18-based immunotherapy administered as per ANBL0032 to be an appropriate standard treatment for children with neuroblastoma following autologous stem cell transplantation.  Overall survival was also better for children randomized to the experimental immunotherapy arm of ANBL0032, although further follow-up will be needed to confirm this survival advantage.  The ANBL0032 study is now open as a single arm study in which all patients receive Ch14.18-based immunotherapy and isotretinoin.</p>
<p>Pediatric oncologists treat most of their patients on protocol and the COG (Children Oncology Group) has a major role is deciding when a treatment is standard of care. COG now considers this to be standard of care and not experimental based on the resutls discussed above.</p>
<p>GILMAN Andrew L. ; FEVZI OZKAYNAK M. ; MATTHAY Katherine K. ; KRAILO Mark ; YU Alice L. ; GAN Jacek ; STERNBERG Adam ; HANK Jacquelyn A. ; SEEGER Robert ; REAMAN Gregory H. ; SONDEL Paul MPhase I Study of ch 14.18 With Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor and Interleukin-2 in Children With Neuroblastoma After Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation or Stem-Cell Rescue : A Report From the Children&#8217;s Oncology Group Journal of clinical oncology 2009, vol. 27, no1, pp. 85-91 [7 page(s) (article)] (23 ref.)</p>
<p><a href="http://ttc.nci.nih.gov/opportunities/opportunity.php?opp_id=1481">http://ttc.nci.nih.gov/opportunities/opportunity.php?opp_id=1481</a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/ch14-18-for-neuroblastoma-pro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Etoposide, doxorubicin, carboplatin for intermediate risk neuroblastoma &#8211; pro</title>
		<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/etoposide-doxorubicin-carboplatin-for-intermediate-risk-neuroblastoma-pro/</link>
		<comments>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/etoposide-doxorubicin-carboplatin-for-intermediate-risk-neuroblastoma-pro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 01:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pediatric Cancers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/?p=6952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With current treatments, patients with low and intermediate risk disease have an excellent prognosis with cure rates above 90%. There are no FDA approved drugs for neuroblastoma and therefore  this regimen and the individual drugs are considered off-label  but it is medically necessary  based on phase II studies. The most common combination of drugs to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With current treatments, patients with low and intermediate risk disease have an excellent prognosis with cure rates above 90%. There are no FDA approved drugs for neuroblastoma and therefore  this regimen and the individual drugs are considered off-label  but it is medically necessary  based on phase II studies. The most common combination of drugs to treat neuroblastoma consists of carboplatin (or cisplatin), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide. Chemotherapy is given for four to eight cycles (12 to 24 weeks) and consists of moderate doses of carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide. The cumulative dose of each agent is kept low to minimize permanent injury from the chemotherapy regimen. Radiation therapy is reserved for patients with symptomatic life-threatening or organ-threatening tumor that does not respond rapidly enough to chemotherapy and/or surgery.</p>
<p>Phase III studies are difficult to perform in this disease because of the wide use of bone marrow transplatation. Although it is being delivered on a clincal trial, pediatric cancer is exceptional in that 95% of children with cancer are treated on a trail and within a trial framework, in the Children Oncology Group, and mere includion in a trial should not be conisdered to render it experimental. However, this combination is novel in that it doeas not include cyclophopshamide or ifosfamide and I had not been able to find this specific combinaton or regimen reported previously. For this reason I consider it investigational, especially on trial.</p>
<p>Baker DL, Schmidt M, Cohn S, et al.: A phase III trial of biologically-based therapy reduction for intermediate risk neuroblastoma. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-9504, 2007.</p>
<p>Neuroblastoma 2005<br />
Publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg<br />
ISBN 978-3-540-40841-3 (Print) 978-3-540-26616-7 (Online) , p. 199</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/etoposide-doxorubicin-carboplatin-for-intermediate-risk-neuroblastoma-pro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CAMT &#8211; pro</title>
		<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/camt-pro/</link>
		<comments>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/camt-pro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Levin, MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hematology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pediatric Cancers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/?p=5729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia (CAMT) is clinically characterized by thrombocytopenia presenting at birth in a child without congenital or skeletal malformations, reduced or absent bone marrow megakaryocytes, and eventual progression to bone marrow failure. The problem is an absence of a receptor for thrombopoietin. There is not curative option at thsi time other than allogeneic transpalnt. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<p>Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia (CAMT) is clinically characterized by thrombocytopenia presenting at birth in a child without congenital or skeletal malformations, reduced or absent bone marrow megakaryocytes, and eventual progression to bone marrow failure. The problem is an absence of a receptor for thrombopoietin. There is not curative option at thsi time other than allogeneic transpalnt. This is a rare condition for which there are no prospective trials and none are possible. However, from the reported cases it is clear that the only care options are platelet transfusions, to which eventually the patient becomes refractory, or stem cell transplantation.</p>
<p>Amy E. Geddis Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia Pediatric BLood Cancer<br />
Article first published online: 18 FEB 2011 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.22927</p>
<p>King S, Germeshausen M, Strauss G, Welte K, Ballmaier M (December 2005). &#8220;Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia: a retrospective clinical analysis of 20 patients&#8221;. Br. J. Haematol. 131 (5): 636–44.</p>
<p>Rose MJ, Nicol KK, Skeens MA, Gross TG, Kerlin BA (June 2008). &#8220;Congenital amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia: the diagnostic importance of combining pathology with molecular genetics&#8221;. Pediatr Blood Cancer 50 (6): 1263–5.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/camt-pro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Childhood ALL &#8211; pro</title>
		<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/allogeneic-stem-cell-transplantation-in-childhood-all-pro/</link>
		<comments>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/allogeneic-stem-cell-transplantation-in-childhood-all-pro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Levin, MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pediatric Cancers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/?p=4568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ALL is the most common cancer diagnosed in children and represents almost 25% of cancers in children younger than 15 years. Complete remission of disease is now typically achieved with pediatric chemotherapy regimens in approximately 95% of children with ALL, with up to 85% long-term survival rates. Those who relapse have few good options; retreatment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALL is the most common cancer diagnosed in children and represents almost 25% of cancers in children younger than 15 years. Complete remission of disease is now typically achieved with pediatric chemotherapy regimens in approximately 95% of children with ALL, with up to 85% long-term survival rates. Those who relapse have few good options; retreatment rarely produces a cure.</p>
<p>Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared outcomes of hematopoietic SCT to outcomes with conventional-dose chemotherapy in children with ALL did not demonstrate superiority of transplantation in all comers but did suggest that those at high risk for relapse or those in relaspe adn remission, did better. The literature in general shows promising results for allogeneic SCT in patients in CR1 at high risk for recurrence, and in patients in second or greater remission. This conclusion is further supported by an evidence-based systematic review of the literature sponsored by the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT)(Hahn et al). Outcomes following matched unrelated donor and umbilical cord blood transplants have improved significantly over the past decade and may offer outcome similar to that obtained with matched sibling donor transplants.</p>
<p>Hahn, T, Wall, D, Camitta, B, et al. The role of cytotoxic therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children: an evidence-based review. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005 Nov;11(11):823-61. Fagioli, F, Zecca, M, Rognoni, C, et al. Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Philadelphia-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children and Adolescents: A Retrospective Multicenter Study of the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (AIEOP). Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011 Oct 20.</p>
<p>PDQ &#8211; <a href="http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/childALL/HealthProfessional/page7">http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/childALL/HealthProfessional/page7</a></p>
<p>Gonzalez-Vicent, M, Molina, B, Andion, M, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation using haploidentical donor vs. unrelated cord blood donor in pediatric patients: a single-center retrospective study. Eur J Haematol. 2011 Jul;87(1):46-53.</p>
<p>Nemecek, ER, Ellis, K, He, W, et al. Outcome of myeloablative conditioning and unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in third remission. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011 Dec;17(12):1833-40. PM</p>
<p>Pui, CH, Pei, D, Campana, D, et al. Improved prognosis for older adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 1;29(4):386-91. PMID: 21172890</p>
<p>Arico, M, Schrappe, M, Hunger, SP, et al. Clinical outcome of children with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated between 1995 and 2005. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 1;28(31):4755-61.</p>
<p>Read the Layperson version<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><a title="Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in childhood ALL" href="http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/allogeneic-stem-cell-transplantation-in-childhood-all/"><span style="color: #ff0000;"> here</span></a></span></strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/allogeneic-stem-cell-transplantation-in-childhood-all-pro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neuroblastoma &#8211; Stem Cell Transplantation &#8211; pro</title>
		<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/neuroblastoma-stem-cell-transplantation-pro/</link>
		<comments>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/neuroblastoma-stem-cell-transplantation-pro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 15:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Levin, MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pediatric Cancers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transplantation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/?page_id=1960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lay Summary: Neuroblastoma is the only PNET in which the value of stem cell transpalntation in certain situations has been proven. Primitive neuroepithelial tumors include medulloblastoma, neuroblastoma arising in the central nervous system, ependymoblastoma, or pineoblastoma. All show a similar histology and are principally distinguished by their site of origin. Essentially, medulloblastoma may be considered [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Lay Summary: Neuroblastoma is the only PNET in which the value of stem cell transpalntation in certain situations has been proven.</em></p>
<p>Primitive neuroepithelial tumors include medulloblastoma, neuroblastoma arising in the central nervous system, ependymoblastoma, or pineoblastoma. All show a similar histology and are principally distinguished by their site of origin. Essentially, medulloblastoma may be considered a cerebellar or posterior fossa PNET while pineoblastoma may be considered a PNET arising in the pineal gland, and neuroblastomas may be considered a central PNET.</p>
<p>High-dose myeloablative therapy in conjunction with either autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for the treatment of neuroblastoma has been used since the early 1980s in a variety of investigative settings. The first randomized trial by the European Neuroblastoma Study Group showed better progression-free survival for children with transplantation; however, the study was small and the controls received no continuing therapy. Subsequent phase I/II trials indicated that increased disease-free survival (DFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were achieved with autologous transplant compared with historical controls or groups that had received more standard chemotherapy regimens. Interpretation and comparison of the studies is difficult due to the variety of regimens tested and whether time to progression was calculated from the start of induction therapy or from the date of transplant. Comparison with historical controls is also complicated by the addition of platinum regimens in 1982, which improved PFS and overall survival (OS) results for standard chemotherapy.</p>
<p>A Phase II Study (protocol number CCG-3891) by the Children’s Cancer Group (CCG) investigated tandem autologous stem cell transplantation in high risk neuroblastoma patients (Grupp, 2000). The study enrolled 39 participants but only 37 patients completed the first autologous stem cell transplant and 33 (89%) completed the second autologous stem cell transplant. With a median follow-up of 22 months, 26 (67%) patients remained event free, with a 3 year estimated event free survival (EFS) of 58%. The rate of death due to toxicity 8% was comparable to the mortality rate of a single-cycle autologous stem cell transplant.</p>
<p>In an update of 97 patients treated between 1994 and 2002, George and colleagues (2006) reported encouraging long term survival with tandem autologous stem cell transplants for patients with high risk neuroblastoma.  Patients underwent induction therapy with five cycles of standard agents, resection of the primary tumor and local radiation followed by two consecutive courses of myeloablative therapy along with total-body irradiation and peripheral blood stem cell rescue. The study reported progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 and 7 years of 47% and 45%, and an overall survival (OS) rate at 5 and 7 years was 60% and 53%, respectively.</p>
<p>Tandem autologous transplant regimens have yet to be tested in a randomized controlled trial for other pediatric solid tumors. There is an ongoing, open label, non-randomized clinical trial studying tandem transplants in gliomas which include PNET. Other investigational approaches for advanced solid tumors include novel chemotherapy regimens, multiple HDC/stem cell cycles, differentiating agents, monoclonal antibodies, and genetic manipulations.</p>
<p>No randomized controlled trials of autologous bone marrow transplantation have been published to date for other high risk pediatric solid tumors other than neuroblastoma. Several small phase I/ II or case control studies have been performed. Most of these studies include different tumor types, multiple prior treatments, and even different bone marrow transplant regimens, making conclusions and comparisons quite difficult. While some studies have hinted at a benefit for transplant, other trials have found no difference. For neurobalstome, recurrent or high risk, stem cell transplantation is considered medically necessary. Tandem transplants may be better for neuroblastoma. Several case series demonstrated significantly better outcomes for individuals with high-risk disease who received tandem autologous transplantation compared with single autologous transplantation. Three-year overall survival (OS) rates ranged from 57–79%.</p>
<p>The Shimada index is a histopathologic classification system, widely used for neuroblastoma, developed by H. Shimada. Using the Shimada criteria, kids with neuroblastoma can be grouped into a favorable or unfavorable category. It&#8217;s based on the presence or absence of cell stroma, the degree of differentiation, and the mitosis-karyorrhexis index. Another researcher, Joshi, has simplified Shimada&#8217;s classification system. Now both these researchers, along with others, are working to combine the predictive abilities of both into a simple and comprehensive system.</p>
<p>Histology refers to the actual tumor pathology. The best method for classifying histology is the Shimada index. It reads:</p>
<p>Favorable:</p>
<ul>
<li>stroma rich, all ages, no nodular pattern</li>
<li>stroma poor, age 1.5-5 yr, differentiated, MKI &lt; 100</li>
<li>stroma poor, age &lt;1.5 yr, MKI &lt; 200</li>
</ul>
<p>Unfavorable:</p>
<ul>
<li>stroma rich, all ages, nodular pattern</li>
<li>stroma poor, age &gt;5 yr</li>
<li>stroma poor, age 1.5-5 yr, undifferentiated</li>
<li>stroma poor, age &lt; 1.5 yr, MKI &gt; 200</li>
</ul>
<p>MKI is the mitosis-karyorrhexis index (number of mitoses and karyorrhexis per 5,000 cells)</p>
<p><strong>The risk of progression of the tumor causing morbidity and mortality is gauged based on the stage of the tumor, the age of the child at diagnosis, and tumor biology. The biological features considered are the Shimada classification, amplification of the MYCN gene, and the number of chromosomes in tumor cells. Besides histology, there are other factors that are important when determining prognostic significance. Of course, the age at diagnosis is important, with children under the age of 1 year having the best overall prognosis. Here are some other important factors:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>neuron-specific enolase: normal level (1- 100 ng/ml) &gt; abnormal (&gt; 100 ng/ml)</li>
<li>ferritin level: normal level (0- 150 ng/ml) &gt; abnormal (&gt; 150 ng/ml)</li>
<li>VMA/HVA ratio: high (&gt; 1) &gt; low (&lt; 1)</li>
<li>stage: I or II or IVs &gt; III &gt; IV</li>
<li>site of primary tumor: neck/ posterior mediastinum/ pelvis &gt; abdominal primaries</li>
<li>gallium uptake by tumor: absent &gt; present</li>
<li>n-myc amplification: 1 n-myc copy &gt; greater than 1 n-myc copy</li>
<li>P-glycoprotein levels in tumor cells at dx: expression before treatment may be of some prognostic significance.</li>
<li>expression of neural growth factor receptor (TRK) gene: high levels of messenger RNA of TRK gene in tumor cells strongly predicts good outcome.</li>
<li>lower LDH levels (&lt; 1500 u/ml) &gt; high LDH levels (&gt; 1500 u/ml)</li>
<li>Ha-ras p21 expression: aggressive tumors have low expression of Ha-ras p51. High Ha-ras p21 correlates with better disease-free survival.</li>
<li>chromosome 1p deletion is associated with poor survival.</li>
</ul>
<p>American Society for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation. Policy Statements, Guidelines and Reviews. Available at:  <a href="http://www.asbmt.org/">http://www.asbmt.org/</a>.</p>
<p>Barrett D, Fish JD, Grupp SA. Autologous and allogeneic cellular therapies for high-risk pediatric solid tumors. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2010 Feb;57(1):47-66.</p>
<p>Dome JF, Rodriquez-Galindo Cl Spunt SL, Santana VM. Pediatric solid tumors. In: Abeloff MD, Armitage JO, Niederhuber JE, Kastan MB, McKenna WG, editors. Clinical Oncology, 4th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2008.</p>
<p>Helman LJ, Malkin D. Cancers of childhood. In: Devita, Jr. VT, Lawrence TS, Rosenberg SA, editors. Devita, Hellman, and Rosenberg’s Cancer: Principles &amp; Practice of Oncology, 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins; 2008.</p>
<p>Justyna Kanold, MD et al, Long-term results of CD34+ cell transplantation in children with neuroblastoma  Medical and Pediatric Oncology, Volume 35, Issue 1 , Pages 1 &#8211; 7</p>
<p>Bertuzzi A, Castagna L, Nozza A et al. High-dose chemotherapy in poor-prognosis adult small round-cell tumors: Clinical and molecular results from a prospective study. J Clin Oncol 2002;20(8):2181-2188</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/neuroblastoma-stem-cell-transplantation-pro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
