<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cancer Treatment Today &#187; Layperson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/category/layperson-articles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org</link>
	<description>Knowledge is Power</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 23:39:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Lapatinib and tastuzumab for HER+ colorectal cancer &#8211; pro</title>
		<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/lapatinib-and-tastuzumab-for-her-colrectal-cacner-pro/</link>
		<comments>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/lapatinib-and-tastuzumab-for-her-colrectal-cacner-pro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2019 19:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Levin, MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Acute Myelogenous Leukemia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/?p=15330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is evidence to support HER based therapy from the phase II HERACLES-A study that used meticulous biomarker selection of patients with HER2-amplified colorectal cancer, who typically do not respond well to conventional treatment options A two-pronged strategy, with lapatinib and trastuzumab yielded positive results in this subset of patients. Lapatinib plus trastuzumab is a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is evidence to support HER based therapy from the phase II HERACLES-A study that used meticulous biomarker selection of patients with HER2-amplified colorectal cancer, who typically do not respond well to conventional treatment options A two-pronged strategy, with lapatinib and trastuzumab yielded positive results in this subset of patients.<br />
Lapatinib plus trastuzumab is a potential new treatment option for treatment-refractory HER2-positive colorectal cancer. seven trials: two diagnostic, three therapeutic (HERACLES-A, HERACLES-B, and HERACLES RESCUE), and two translational studies. HERACLES-B is evaluating pertuzumab (Perjeta) and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (also known as T-DM1 [Kadcyla]), and HERACLES RESCUE is looking at ado-trastuzumab emtansine monotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer that has progressed on lapatinib and trastuzumab in HERACLES-A. IT is specifically the combined treatment that showed efficacy.<br />
These studies need to be completed and published before one can conclude that this combined treatment is medically necessary.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>.Siena S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Trusolino L, et al: Final results of the HERACLES trial in HER2-amplified colorectal cancer. 2017 AACR Annual Meeting. Abstract CT005. Presented April 2, 2017.</p>
<p>http://www.abstractsonline.com/pp8/#!/4292/presentation/12323</p>
<p>S. Siena et al, Targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) oncogene in colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2018 May; 29(5): 11081119</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/lapatinib-and-tastuzumab-for-her-colrectal-cacner-pro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cytogenetics for myelofibrosis -Pro</title>
		<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/cytogenetics-for-myelofibrosis-pro/</link>
		<comments>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/cytogenetics-for-myelofibrosis-pro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2014 12:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Levin, MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myelofibrosis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/?p=11906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cytogenetics are now routinely recommended for myelofibrosis. Guidelines (Reilly et al) indicate that beyond a routine bone marrow aspiration and biopsy, JAK2 V617F mutation screening should be carried out routinely in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF). Quantitative results are not required for clinical management.BCR-ABL1 rearrangement should be excluded in cases with atypical trephine biopsy features, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cytogenetics are now routinely recommended for myelofibrosis. Guidelines (Reilly et al) indicate that beyond a routine bone marrow aspiration and biopsy, JAK2 V617F mutation screening should be carried out routinely in patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF). Quantitative results are not required for clinical management.BCR-ABL1 rearrangement should be excluded in cases with atypical trephine biopsy features, or if the patient lacks a mutation in JAK2 or MPL. PDGFRA and PDGFB rearrangements should be excluded in the presence of significant eosinophilia. (Screening for other mutations remains a research tool and routine screening cannot be justified, apart from in cases of diagnostic difficulty where detection of a clonal abnormality would be informative) (Evidence level 2, Grade B). This recommendation does not include cytogenetics.</p>
<p>Recently there is evidence that cytogenetics can refine prognostic information which can help make decision, especially about stem cell transplantation. The factors not included in the IPSS that affect survival are represented by red cell transfusion need,12 thrombocytopenia,13 and “unfavorable” karyotype. Regarding the latter, patients with unfavorable karyotype, which includes a complex karyotype or sole or 2 abnormalities such as +8, −7/7q−, i(17q), inv(3), −5/5q−, 12p−, or 11q23, had a median survival of 2 years compared with 5.2 years for those with a “favorable” karyotype, defined as no abnormality or any other apart from those included in the above category, the 5-year survival rates were 8% and 51%, respectively. The newly devised DIPSS Plus score11 incorporates these additional 3 variables for improved prognostic categorization. In a series of 793 patients, median survival times were 185, 78, 35, and 16 months for the low, intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and high-risk categories, respectively.</p>
<p>Based on its inclusion into a recommended prognostic tool DIPSS Plus, cytogenetics should not longer be considered investigational<br />
.</p>
<p>Reilly JT, McMullin MF, Beer PA, Butt N, Conneally E, Duncombe A, Green AR, George Michaeel N, Gilleece MH, Hall GW, Knapper S, Mead A, Mesa RA, Sekhar M, Wilkins B, Harrison CN, Writing group: British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Guideline for the diagnosis and management of myelofibrosis. Br J Haematol. 2012 Aug;158(4):453-71. [123 references]<br />
Jennifer Dunlap, MD, Katalin Kelemen, MD, PhD, Nicky Leeborg, MD, Rita Braziel, MD, Susan Olson, PhD, Richard Press, MD, PhD, James Huang, MD, Ken Gatter, JD, MD, Marc Loriaux, MD, PhD, Guang Fan, Association of JAK2 Mutation Status and Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;135(5):709-719.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/cytogenetics-for-myelofibrosis-pro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atypical CML</title>
		<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/atypical-cml/</link>
		<comments>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/atypical-cml/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 20:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Levin, MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layperson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atyoical CML. CML. Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/?p=11779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Atypical chronic myelogenous leukemia (aCML) is a leukemic disorder that exhibits both myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative features at the time of diagnosis. What this means is that it is not truly a CML but a condition that can be confused with CML, but is essentially different. It is not very common. It is thought that these [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atypical chronic myelogenous leukemia (aCML) is a leukemic disorder that exhibits both myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative features at the time of diagnosis. What this means is that it is not truly a CML but a condition that can be confused with CML, but is essentially different. It is not very common. It is thought that these features denote a poor prognosis, but these cases ahve a variety of genetic abnormalities that are different from CML and not much is known about how theya ffect prognosis.  Atypical CML cases are usually BCR-ABL negative. The optimal treatment of aCML is uncertain because of the rare incidence of this chronic leukemic disorder. Treatment with hydroxyurea may lead to short-lived partial remissions of 2- to 4-months&#8217; duration. Atypical CML, appears to respond poorly to treatment with interferon-alpha or other CML treatments.</p>
<p>For Professional version see <a title="Atypical CML – pro" href="http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/atypical-cml-pro/"><span style="color: #ff0000;">here</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/atypical-cml/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BREVAgen</title>
		<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/brevagen/</link>
		<comments>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/brevagen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 14:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Levin, MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cancer Prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetic Cancer Syndromes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inherited Breast Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layperson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BREVAgen.Personalized Medicine.Genetic Cancer. Gail Risk.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/?p=11773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Personalized medicine is an up and coming approach, by which individual&#8217;s risks and factors are taken into account to prescribe therapy. Genetic tests are a part of the approach. BREVAGen evaluates 7 breast cancer-associated factors. Risk is calculated by multiplying the product of the individual risks by the Gail model risk The Gail model is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personalized medicine is an up and coming approach, by which individual&#8217;s risks and factors are taken into account to prescribe therapy. Genetic tests are a part of the approach. BREVAGen evaluates 7 breast cancer-associated factors. Risk is calculated by multiplying the product of the individual risks by the Gail model risk The Gail model is the first of several proposed ways to calcucalte an individual&#8217;s riask for breast cancer.  BREVAGen has been evaluated for use in Caucasian women of European descent age 35 years and older. According to the BREVAGen website, “suitable candidates” for testing include women with a Gail lifetime risk of 15% or greater; with high lifetime estrogen exposure (e.g., early menarche and late menopause); or with relatives diagnosed with breast cancer. BREVAGen is not suitable for women with previous diagnoses of lobular carcinoma in situ, ductal carcinoma in situ, or breast cancer, since the Gail model cannot calculate breast cancer risk accurately for such women, or for women with an extensive family history of breast and ovarian cancer.</p>
<p>BREVAgen was validated only in comparison to Gail score. Being that the Gail score is the least sensitive scoring tool available and that it is widely considered inadequate, it is hard to have confidence in the validation process. In addition, the risk calculation that depends on multiplying SNP risks by Gail raises its own questions of accuracy. Finally, there is no prospective evidence that BREVAgen produces clinical evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/brevagen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olysio and Sovaldi: Two new drugs for Hepatitis C</title>
		<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/olysio-and-sovaldi-two-new-drugs-for-hepatitis-c/</link>
		<comments>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/olysio-and-sovaldi-two-new-drugs-for-hepatitis-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 14:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Levin, MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HIV and AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infectious Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layperson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olysio.Sovaldi.Hepatitis C. interferon. Pegulated INterferon. Peg0interfeon.New Hepatitis Drugs. Heapatitis Treatment.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/?p=11768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hepatitis C is a major public health problem, especially in Southeast Asia. Interferon and ribavirin have been the standard of care in various combinations. The literature supports intereferon with the two recently FDA  approved oral medications that can be used in combination with the current antiviral regimen or to replace the injectable component of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hepatitis C is a major public health problem, especially in Southeast Asia. Interferon and ribavirin have been the standard of care in various combinations. The literature supports intereferon with the two recently FDA  approved oral medications that can be used in combination with the current antiviral regimen or to replace the injectable component of the regimen, peginterferon alfa.</p>
<p>The two new drugs are Olysio (simeprevir) capsules and Sovaldi (sofosbuvir) tablets. Both work by stopping the replication of the Hepatitis C virus.</p>
<p>Olysio 150 mg capsules are a once-daily treatment that must be used in combination with pegylated interferon (peginterferon alfas like Pegasys or Pegintron) and ribavirin. It cannot currently be used as monotherapy, which means it can’t be used alone. Sovaldi 400 mg tablets are a once-daily treatment that can be used without the injectable peginterferon alfa. This is novel and helpful in hepatitis therapy because the peginterferon alfa injectable often contributes to patients not finishing their course of Hep C therapy due to the unfavorable side effects.</p>
<p>Based on a side-by-side review if disparate studies, Sovald appears to be more versatile than Olysio as it is approved for treatment of genotypes 1, 2, 3 and 4. Also, for genotype 2 and 3, Sovaldi can be taken with ribavirin alone, excluding the need for interferon altogether. (Interferon, perhaps the most dreaded component of HCV therapy, is administered by injection and many side effects.  On the other hand, Olysio must always be used in combination with interferon and ribavirin for the duration of either 24 weeks (for treatment-naive patients) or 48 weeks (for patients previously exposed to HCV therapy). However ,it cannot be used with many retroviral drugs.</p>
<p>Using the two together is beginning to be explored, with early results showing efficacy in even hard-to-treat cases. In early January, the New England Journal published a study of the combination of these two drugs. he New England Journal of Medicine, investigators designed a Phase II open-label study of Gilead Sciences’ recently approved nucleotide analogue NS5B polymerase inhibitor Sovaldi and Bristol-Myers Squibb’s NS5A replication complex inhibitor daclatasvir.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1306218" target="_blank">Sulkowski MS, et al &#8220;Daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir for previously treated or untreated chronic HCV infection&#8221; <em>N Engl J Med</em> 2014; 370: 211-221.</a></p>
<p>Sovaldi, Prescribing Information 2014</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/olysio-and-sovaldi-two-new-drugs-for-hepatitis-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does measuring antibodies to infliximab help?</title>
		<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/does-measuring-antibodies-to-infliximab-help/</link>
		<comments>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/does-measuring-antibodies-to-infliximab-help/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 01:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Levin, MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layperson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crohns. INfliximab. ATI.IBD.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/?p=11760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Antibodies to infliximab (ATIs) have been associated with loss of clinical response and lower serum infliximab (IFX) levels in some studies of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Presumable lower levels mean less effectiveness, but it needs to be proven. It may be clinically useful to be able to  assess and predict diminishing response. A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antibodies to infliximab (ATIs) have been associated with loss of clinical response and lower serum infliximab (IFX) levels in some studies of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Presumable lower levels mean less effectiveness, but it needs to be proven. It may be clinically useful to be able to  assess and predict diminishing response. A recent meta-analysis of all available studies concluded that the presence of ATIs is associated with a significantly higher risk of loss of clinical response to IFX and lower serum IFX levels in patients with IBD. However, most studies were flawed in that published studies on this topic lack uniform reporting of outcomes and high risk of bias was present in all the included studies. This means that the method of metanalysis may not be accurate in pooling all studies and obtaining a meaningful result.</p>
<p>Similar conclusions are reached by reviews that look at this question. For example, a recent paper outlines why antibodies to infliximab (ATI) cannot be used as a surrogate marker for immunogenicity, or to predict clinical outcome or safety. This is because up to half of patients still need dose adjustment for recurrent symptoms and 20% of patients lose response, even when treatment is optimised to avoid ATI through scheduled maintenance therapy or concomitant immunomodulators</p>
<p>Measurement of serum antibodies to infliximab has not received clearance by the FDA and there is not sufficient peer-reviewed scientific literature that demonstrates that the procedure is effective.</p>
<p>See Professional version <a title="Antibodies to inflixumab" href="http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/antibodies-to-inflixumab/"><span style="color: #ff0000;">here</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/does-measuring-antibodies-to-infliximab-help/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rituxan for Hairy Cell Leukemia</title>
		<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/rituxan-for-hairy-cell-leukemia/</link>
		<comments>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/rituxan-for-hairy-cell-leukemia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 18:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Levin, MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cancer Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[. RItuxan.Rituximab.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hairy Cell Leumia. Leukemic Reticulocytosis. Leukemia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/?p=11751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recent literature suggests that a subgroup of Hairy Cell Leukemia(HCL), sometimes called Variant Hairy Cell(HCL-V)  may in fact be a different type of Lymphoma and not Hairy Cell, and that it may respond to rituximab to a much higher extent than common Hairy Cell does. It is what was called Leukemic Reticuloendotheliosis in the past. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recent literature suggests that a subgroup of Hairy Cell Leukemia(HCL), sometimes called Variant Hairy Cell(HCL-V)  may in fact be a different type of Lymphoma and not Hairy Cell, and that it may respond to rituximab to a much higher extent than common Hairy Cell does. It is what was called Leukemic Reticuloendotheliosis in the past. It accounts for approximately 0.4% of chronic lymphoid malignancies and 10% of all HCl cases. In contrast to HCl-C, HCl-V is a more aggressive disease and according to the new WHO classification it is no longer considered to be biologically related to HCl-C. Patients with HCl-V have an elevated white blood count, easy-to-aspirate bone marrow (unlike HCL) and weak reactivity to tartrate &#8211; resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP).  HCl-V cells are positive for CD103 and CD11c and negative for CD25. The HCl-V cells express also the B-cell antigens, CD19, CD20 and CD22. The HCl-V patients frequently have an unmutated Ig gene configuration. Currently, the principles of therapy for this rare disease derive from uncontrolled single institutional studies, or even single case reports. In contrast to HCl-C, the HCl-V respond to purine nucleoside analogs (PNA) but response is limited to partial responses in approximately 50% of patients. However, complete responses were observed in some patients treated with rituximab and anti-CD22 immunotoxins.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>For Professional version se<a title="Rituxan for variant Hairy Cell Leukemia – pro" href="http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/11572/" target="_blank">e<span style="color: #ff0000;"> here</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/rituxan-for-hairy-cell-leukemia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Velcade for Graft Vesus Host Disease</title>
		<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/velcade-for-graft-vesus-host-disease/</link>
		<comments>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/velcade-for-graft-vesus-host-disease/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 18:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Levin, MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graft versus Host Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layperson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stem Cell Transplantation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bortezomib]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GVHD. Graft Versus Host Disease. Allogeneic Stem Cell Transpantation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Velcade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/?p=11745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shen transplanted from an immunologically different person, graft cells can attack the host&#8217;s body. This is called Graft Versus Host Diseas*GVHD)e and remains a serious problem in transplantation.  One trial by Koreth and others found that Velcade was beneficial in GVHD; but his was a phase II trial other phase II trials are ongoing. Koreth [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shen transplanted from an immunologically different person, graft cells can attack the host&#8217;s body. This is called Graft Versus Host Diseas*GVHD)e and remains a serious problem in transplantation.  One trial by Koreth and others found that Velcade was beneficial in GVHD; but his was a phase II trial other phase II trials are ongoing. Koreth treated 45 patients; 89% of patients who were treated had a one-locus and 11% of patients were treated with a two-loci mismatch. With a median follow-up of 3 years, the 180-day cumulative incidence of grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD was 22%, and the 1-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 29%. The non-relapse mortality rate was only 11%, and the relapse rate was 38%. Results were comparable with patients who received HLA-matched transplants with the unexpected observation that bortezomib therapy enhanced immune reconstitution of CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells.<br />
The editorial by Giralt that accompanied Koreth report, pointed out that  there are four potential approaches to developing treatments for GVHD problem and that it may be necessary to perform a randomized phase II trial with a short primary end point to be able to rapidly pick a winner from among these competing approaches that could be compared with the current standard in a definitive trial.</p>
<p>For Professional version see<a title="Velcade for Graft Versus Host Disease – pro" href="http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/velcade-for-graft-versus-host-disease-pro/"><span style="color: #ff0000;"> here</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/velcade-for-graft-vesus-host-disease/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capsule Endoscopy</title>
		<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/capsule-endoscopy/</link>
		<comments>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/capsule-endoscopy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2013 16:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Levin, MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cancer Prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colon Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biopsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capsule Endoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonoscopy. Barium enema]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/?p=11703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Capsule Endoscopy(CE) is a procedure in which a capsule with a miniature camera is swallowed and it transmits images as it goes through the gastrointestinal tract. It has advantages and disadvantages. While easier on the patient, it does not allow for a biopsy, and if it shows a suspicious findings, full endoscopyto perform a biopsy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Capsule Endoscopy(CE) is a procedure in which a capsule with a miniature camera is swallowed and it transmits images as it goes through the gastrointestinal tract. It has advantages and disadvantages. While easier on the patient, it does not allow for a biopsy, and if it shows a suspicious findings, full endoscopyto perform a biopsy will still be required. A recent European guideline says that patients at high risk for CRC, because of symptoms or signs consistent with cancer, or a family or personal history of CRC, are at increased risk of advanced colorectal neoplasia and cancer. These patients should be referred to colonoscop, so a biopsy can be immediately performed. However, in patients for whom colonoscopy is inappropriate or not possible, the use of CE could be discussed with the patient (Evidence level 4, Recommendation grade D). A recent review of various guidelines by Shim et al, confirms this recommendation.</p>
<p>For Professional version see<a title="Capsule Endoscopy for gastraintestinal bleeding – pro" href="http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/capsule-endoscopy-for-gastraintestinal-bleeding-pro/"><span style="color: #ff0000;"> here</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/capsule-endoscopy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antibodies to inflixumab</title>
		<link>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/antibodies-to-inflixumab/</link>
		<comments>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/antibodies-to-inflixumab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2013 16:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>M Levin, MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cancer Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gastroenterology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gastrointestinal Diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immunology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immunotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crohn's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INfliximab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serum Antibodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UBD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ulcerative Colitis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/?p=11698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Antibodies to infliximab (ATIs) have been associated with loss of clinical response and lower serum infliximab (IFX) levels in some studies of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Lower drug levels can mean less effect ont eh disease.  It is clinically useful to be able to  assess and predict diminishing response. A recent meta-analysis concluded [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antibodies to infliximab (ATIs) have been associated with loss of clinical response and lower serum infliximab (IFX) levels in some studies of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Lower drug levels can mean less effect ont eh disease.  It is clinically useful to be able to  assess and predict diminishing response. A recent meta-analysis concluded that the presence of ATIs is associated with a significantly higher risk of loss of clinical response to IFX and lower serum IFX levels in patients with IBD. However, most studies were flawed in that published studies on this topic lack uniform reporting of outcomes and high risk of bias was present in all the included studies.</p>
<p>Similar conclusions are reached by reviews that look at this question and are likewise limited in the same way. For example, a recent paper outlines why antibodies to infliximab (ATI) cannot be used as a surrogate marker for immunogenicity,<br />
or to predict clinical outcome or safety. This is because up to half of patients still need dose adjustment for recurrent symptoms and 20% of patients lose response, even when treatment is optimised to avoid ATI through scheduled maintenance therapy or concomitant immunomodulators. The effects of ATI is, therefore, diluted statistically in these studies.</p>
<p>Thus far many questions persist about how useful ATI testing can be. Measurement of serum antibodies to infliximab has not received clearance by the FDA andthere is not sufficient peer-reviewed scientific literature that demonstrates that the procedure is effective.</p>
<p>For Professional version see<a title="Value of antibodies to infliximab (ATI)  – pro" href="http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/value-of-antibodies-to-infliximab-ati-pro/"><span style="color: #ff0000;"> here</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cancertreatmenttoday.org/antibodies-to-inflixumab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
